Fernando Fuster-Fabra's Blog

THANKSGIVING FOR WHAT ?

November 26, 2015
Leave a Comment

With all that’s gojng on in the world, today’s Thanksgiving has absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Seeing what is in store for us in the next few years even makes the scene gloomier.

At the White House seats a man who was awarded a Nobel Peace Award too soon that he never made merits to deserve it.

At the Kremlin rules an iron-fisted man who never ever thought about peace if it wasn’t in his personal terms.

Around the globe, we have rulers sold out to vested interests, puppets that can’t shake a leg on their own.

Meanwhile, cruel wars are waged at the whim of wealthy magnates and macho rulers with the Dollar sign branded in their minds.

syria

Why should we celebrate Thanksgiving for any of that ? 

Definitely, here’s one person who isn’t celebrating Thanksgiving this year.

Fernando Fuster-Fabra

Sitges. Barcelona

Advertisements

CORONATION OF KING JUNCKER

June 26, 2014
Leave a Comment

EU flag tatteredBIS

Spanish Version :- http://wp.me/pRlnf-86

Martin Schulz’s reappointment as President of the European Parliament confirms what has been the behind the scenes talk in Brussels these past days.

Always linked to relevant posts in his country, Luxembourg, Jean-Claude Juncker has been far more influential in the financial structure of world macro-Economics than what is publicly known. This is evident by merely reviewing his CV. His occupying posts at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank (WB), the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), as well as his immense power within the ECOFIN that designed the Euro concentrates in Juncker ties to economic powers that likewise draw up world geo-politics.

In obvious contrast, Juncker has always belonged to a socially-prone Christian party whose principles should favour and encourage social action. Nevertheless, he seems to have contributed very little in this direction.  

We, who lived the years of the transformation from EEC to EU with the Treaty of Maastricht, are aware of Juncker’s key role in the consolidation but also that his economic-prone proposals finally underscored the vision of a more social and just Europe defended by Jacques Delors.   

Just before he is crowned King of the EU, Jean-Claude Juncker has the approval of almost all except the British Prime Minister, David Cameron.

What awaits us in this new rule in which the two main political groups, conservatives and social democrats have signed a treaty to their own interests? Who is the Union’s true ruler?


LEADERS & LIES

December 31, 2012
Leave a Comment

World leaders

 

“Others judge us by our past deeds, we value ourselves on what we are capable of achieving, but it seems no one bothers to evaluate what we are doing here and now.

–       Fernando Fuster-Fabra Fdz.

 

Spanish version: http://wp.me/pRlnf-7C

 

Year 2012 could have been the turning point for the crisis but it has ended being the consolidation of a disastrous style of world governance.

 

The replacement amongst elected and appointed posts in the countries relevant in planning global economy have barely contributed to substantial changes in the governance criteria.

 

A Barack Obama who defaulted on several of his electoral promises during his first term of office ended being reelected whilst the diplomatic incursions of his nation continued leaving dead in the streets of the Middle East. Today, he is still engaged in a tug-of-war with his political adversaries on the brink of the ‘fiscal cliff’, with the worldwide risks same represents for all other state economies.

 

The succession in China has not deterred the tight-fisted censorship that citizens suffer in their path towards global communications thru the new technologies. While they boast of bullet trains, they restrain human rights.

 

European leaders are incapable of reaching an agreement on how to manage a crisis baptized with a name (Euro Crisis) that has little to do with the real situation.  I will not even bother to list down their individual weaknesses as it would turn out to be a never-ending string.

 

Latin America continues being a keg of gunpowder about to vlast depending on who has the lit match in his hand. To mention the extremes, these swing from the inflation down south to the northern assassinations in the hands of the drug mafias.

 

India bears the burden of its most negative traditions, unable to avail of the opportunity of the moment. Corruption, as in many other parts, contaminates the atmosphere just as much its outdated transport system.

 

Russia hardly will ever be a true democracy while people like Putin desire to perpetuate themselves in power. The shadow of the Kremlin hovers like a vulture over its former domains.

 

Japan has just elected a new prime minister of the old school in the hope of salvaging their stagnant economy just as it faces a territorial dispute with neighbouring China over a handful of islands in the China Sea. 

 

The sad truth is that 2012 has been a year wasted by a bunch of leaders who not only did not fulfill but also lied, some rather shamelessly.

 

Who are the ones that control them and who are the true governors of the world?

 

Fernando Fuster-Fabra

Sitges – Barcelona, Spain    


THE UGLY AMERICAN, 2012

November 4, 2012
1 Comment

The Ugly Americans

 

Ever since the Burdick & Lederer’s novel, The Ugly American, was published in 1958, American candidates to the White House and incumbent Presidents have had a chance to face numerous international problems as leaders who have to assume responsibilities attributed the world’s most powerful nation.

 

Nevertheless, time and time again, one President after another has committed quite a number of errors that have led to what the USA is today.

 

On the verge of next Tuesday’s presidential elections, incumbent President Obama and his Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, have demonstrated that Americans have not wagged away the then Asian foreign vision of “the ugly American”.

 

On the contrary, today, American leaders are seen as “ugly” in continents other than Asia. In the last half century, one after another, the U.S. Presidents have blundered in international affairs in Vietnam & Cambodia, in the Caribbean, in the Middle East, in Africa and in Central & South America.

 

From Kennedy to Obama, all White House tenants have had their Achilles heel. Some succumbed to the temptation of playing God and ended causing civil wars or local ethnic cleansing.

 

At the crossroads of American supremacy, President Obama has not only failed to live up to expectations and to a moral commitment after being awarded the Nobel Prize in 2009, but also has selfishly closed himself into what he sensed was to be a battle for his continuance as President of the United States of America. He has, in many ways, taken as his own the very habits of what was described in the novel as “the ugly American”.

 

Regretfully, his adversary is no better off. Mitt Romney considers he is a self-made man who has amassed a fortune with his talents. Nevertheless, if he would look back, I’m sure he will have to admit to himself that he isn’t all that respectable a citizen as he wants to make voters believe. He too is “an ugly American” in the eyes of any foreign beholder.

 

At this stage of the 21st century with new technologies making communications go global with a click, U.S. leaders have seemed to remain stagnant in their 20th century ways of government and diplomacy; precisely those very same manners that worried John F. Kennedy when the novel was first published.

 

Neither Obama nor Romney gets even solid approval from their European allies. I feel, much less would they get it from the Muslim states that their policies have led into an irreversible permanent war.

 

The issue is that none of them have learned from their errors but worst still is that there being an opportunity to be once again the best, both Obama & Romney have decided to just make it to the White House next balloting day.

 

Who is the “uglier American” of the two?

 

 

Fernando Fuster-Fabra

Barcelona, Spain    

 

 

 

 


2012: ANNUS HORRIBILIS?

January 2, 2012
Leave a Comment

Even the best theory is worthless while it isn’t tested and works.

–       Fernando Fuster-Fabra


Versión española: http://wp.me/pRlnf-5y

The recently concluded year should be considered a horrible year for this world in convulsion. We have not cleared through crisis nor has peace been attained the various live fronts nor were the promises made by the North American president each day more absorbed with his re-election bid been kept. On top of all, the developed and supposedly civilized world has permitted the savage hunt of the terrorist, Osama Bin Laden and the brutal beating of Muammar el Gaddafi, the dictator.

Could there be a worst year than last year?

I’m afraid yes. In the offing for 2012 is not only an economically difficult year but also a politically turbulent one.

World leaders insist on thinking in the same mode as when they created this problem; precisely what Albert Einstein advised against when he was forced to abandon his native Germany just before the outbreak of World War II.

Barack Obama no longer thinks about the rest of the world but only on how to hold on tight to his power seat at the White House Oval Office.

Nicholas Sarkozy is in a similar frame of mind, with his own dilemma of holding on to power in neighbouring France; so he may grow up his little daughter in the Élysée.

Angela Merkel has more time left till 2013 to manoeuvre. That is what she is precisely doing, plotting in the name of 27 states subjected to her whims and obsessions on the European public deficit to save the Euro.

For David Cameron, his tantrum at the last European Council did him very little good. Whilst in disagreement with the Merkozy tandem, he is condemned to remain in the EU fold if he does not wish to sail alone in the recession waters that threaten us today.

What can I say about the Brussels bureaucrats? Neither Durao Barroso nor Van Rompuy has sufficient power to challenge the water-downed German version of the “Iron Lady” of the ‘80s. In all probability, other un-elected top notches like Mario Draghi at the ECB or Mario Monti from Italia end up with more power. With Papademos, they form the ‘Goldman Sachs triumvirate’ in the power seats in the EU.

In Spain, in spite of Mariano Rajoy’s victory by majority, it seems evident that he who governs is far away from La Moncloa, instructions being dictated on what to do at each instant.

It is worth observing how the majority of those in power have decided rather theoretical actions, assuming these will be the panacea that will cure all world evil. Meanwhile, practice in the past century has demonstrated that they are rowing counter-current, and I would add, in the wrong direction of an unequivocal solution to the problem.

Not only is the effect of a recession being felt and announced without any qualms to what the market reactions may be but likewise we are forewarned from these seats of globalised power that “either the austerity sacrifices are accepted or watch out for the consequences”.

All in all, it sounds grisly but above all the situation lacks a democratic imprint.

Not even events such as the Olympic Games 2012 in London can make us think than we are in any year other than an annus horribilis.    

Fernando Fuster-Fabra

Barcelona    


THE WORLD IN A NUTSHELL: WHEN ALLIES CANNOT AGREE

November 29, 2011
1 Comment

United we stand, divided we fall.

–       Aesop

Versión en español:   http://wp.me/pRlnf-59

 

The American-European summit in Washington D.C. coincided with the opening session of the Durban Climate Change Conference 2011.

The supposedly steadfast allies spoke of ways to circumvent the world crisis by means of joint efforts to prevent Europe’s debt dilemma to spread to the U.S. coasts across the Atlantic.

On the other front, the United States, jointly with China, maintains a firm stand against the European posture of complying with the soon defunct Kyoto Protocol.

How can problems be solved when there is double-talk amongst allies?

How can any solution be deemed in a global world issue when the players refuse to admit the cause of the problem?

How can the global world expect solutions to a crisis when no priorities are set other than those tending to apply oxygen to financial institutions that were the very epicentre of the economic earthquake?

How can the leaders of the United States and the European Union claim that their meeting was productive when the real relevant issue was left aside to avoid further misunderstandings?

I cannot but repeat myself saying:- “The real problem is not economic rather one of ethics.”

Our world leaders cannot see further than the tip of their noses in their stately myopia whilst 25.000 human beings die every day, forgotten in the speculators’ quest for fast earnings.

Fernando Fuster-Fabra

Barcelona, Spain    


EUROPE’S UNION IN THE CROSSROADS: DO OR DIE

November 15, 2011
5 Comments

Problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them.

–       Albert Einstein

 

 

 

 

Spanish version:  http://wp.me/pRlnf-4D

 

The G-20 Summit of world leaders was held in Cannes a few days ago. As expected, no decisions were taken to resolve the economic crisis that affects the stability of a great number of countries. Not a word was said about establishing restrictions to speculative abuses that crop up based on ratings of agencies prone to cause alarm with their presumptions. Assisting the summit were the principal European leaders representing the EU as well as Germany, France, Italy and United Kingdom as full-pledged members, with Spain and The Netherlands as guests.

Just a few miles away, in Brussels, the Greek crisis with a call for referendum warning and the forthcoming Italian tempest had been left unsolved. Today, the Greek crisis remains unsolved although Greece’s elected Prime Minister (Papandreou) has had to step down and a new one (Papademos) appointed in his place without any elections.  Something similar went on in Italy just a few hours ago, with the forced resignation of Berlusconi after the approval of the demanded reforms and the appointment of Monti to replace him.

Two new figures, not elected by their respective citizens, assume their respective tasks; technocrats, as they are called, but without analysing their close links to the financial structures that, in my opinion, have been the root of this entire regrettable situation. Lukas Papademos was Vice-President of the ECB from 2002 till 2008 when Jean Claude Trichet was President whilst Mario Monti not only was a European Commissioner but also a consultant of the notorious American bank, Goldman Sachs.

Furthermore, in November, the turnover at the ECB has also taken place, with an Italian, Mario Draghi, taking over the chair occupied by Trichet from 2003 till late October. He is another figure related to the bank (Goldman Sachs) that caused more than a single financial quake, amongst which it is worth mentioning its advisory role to the Greek Government in the times of the conservative, Kostas Karamanlis, precisely when the state accounts were falsified in the reports to Brussels.

The irony of this entire circus is that a legitimately elected Papandreou was forced out of office for calling a referendum to approve his proposals but no one has said a word about prosecuting neither Karamanlis nor Goldman Sachs por having intentionally lied, causing the domino effect on the weaker Eurozone economies.

Thus, not only has a chance been lost in Cannes to set up global regulating and supervisory measure of the larger banking entities as well as the rating agencies but also it has allowed a slow transfer of previous bank executives and personalities linked to these entities to occupy relevant posts in the hierarchical big-shots of the EU and in the government of its member states.

Likewise, the American stance has taken a 360 degree change from Pittsburgh to Cannes. With elections in 2012, Obama does not wish to risk any confrontation with potential donors for his campaign funds, amongst which we may mention the larger U.S. banks and the powerful Jewish lobby. He abandons Europe to its fate, above all because he does not share the curt German stance in some questions of procedure and timing. Not even the goodwill efforts of the French President and proud father of a baby girl served to ease the tense atmosphere. Furthermore, Obama is aware that in spite of the Euro crisis, the currency has a strong quotation, benefitting the U.S. Dollar and facilitating its exports to the Old Continent while decreasing European countries competitiveness in world trade.

What seems to have gone unnoticed in all this week of European tension after the Cannes summit is that Munich  prosecutors ordered a search in the Deutsche Bank offices in relation to the famous ‘Kirch affaire’. In spite of the death of communications magnate, Leo Kirch, the lawsuit against Deutsche Bank continues its course, with outgoing CEO, Josef Ackerman, in the midst of the storm. The matter must have been of such importance that Ackerman announced his decision not to seek the appointment to the bank’s presidency, a rather difficult manoeuvre after the German banking law reforms in 2009. Said reforms establish a two-year grace period before a former CEO can aspire to the presidential post of a bank, with the only exception that 25% of the stockholders so demanded.

Angela Merkel has covered many inside details of the decisions taken in relation with the German banking system between 2005 and 2011, as well as her personal pact with Gerhard Schröder, with regards such a vital issue as energy, disguised under the so-called ‘grand coalition’. Few are conscious of the of Merkel’s stubborn tenacity that has brought her from that membership in the communist youth movement in her younger years in the extinguished GDR to become ‘my girl’ for conservative, Helmut Kohl. Her rise to power came by pure chance after a scandal caused the downfall of Kohl’s chosen successor, Wolfgang Schäuble, actually the Economic Minister in Merkel’s cabinet.

Perhaps that is the reason that one has given due importance to the very recent announcement of the inauguration of start-up of Operation Nord Stream, the gas pipeline agreed upon between Russia and German, with the blessing of France, The Netherlands and United Kingdom. Said pipeline will go from Vyborg in Russia to Greifswald in Germany in a submarine line across the Baltic Sea. In Russia’s behalf the participations is headed by state-owned Gazprom as natural gas supplier and Nord Stream AG, a German enterprise has been set up to handle constructions and operations. It is interesting to observe that former Prime Minister Schröeder has been involved in the Nord Stream project and with Gazprom since December, 2005, roughly a month after stepping down in favour of Angela Merkel.   

What makes this affair even uglier is the fact that the powerful EU members will share the spoils of Russian gas without sharing a bit with other Baltic member states, namely – Poland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia – nor seem to have offered a gas link to the Scandinavian states for the moment. Nevertheless, said gas will indeed go across the English Channel to the United Kingdom.

This project is contrary to the interest of the pan-European Nabucco project which had set the goal of constructing a gas pipeline from Erzurum in Turkey to Baumgarten in Austria, precisely with the intention of breaking EU dependence on Russian gas supply. The problems generated with Gazprom gas supply through Ukraine have left Central Europe and Italy without a reliable supply in more than one occasion whilst Turkey had offered its facilities in a sign of goodwill in its bid to join the EU. Germany has again vetoed a state that has been accumulating more merits to join the EU than some who already are in.

With partners who demand from the south sacrifices but will not share the favourable agreements with other non-EU states, it is no wonder that the Union of 27, each day, is turning into a more difficult endeavour.  In addition, those who impose the terms & conditions interpret the Stability & Growth Pact in such a manner as to oblige members to apply solutions thought out in conventional terms, in precisely the same line as those that created the problem.

Whilst our present-century ‘Medea’ is bossing around in Europe, the route travelled will be the wrong one and the estrangement amongst members each day larger.  How much must we wait before Merkel is sent into exile?     

Fernando Fuster-Fabra

Barcelona, Spain     


CAPITALISM’S CASINO & ITS RIGGED ROULLETTE

October 31, 2011
Leave a Comment

I can forgive Alfred Nobel for having invented dynamite, but only a fiend in human form could have invented the Nobel Prize.

–       George Bernard Shaw

 

Versión Español:

http://wp.me/pRlnf-4v

 

I have come to wonder if the witty Bernard Shaw in saying what he said about the Nobel Prize was right, especially after the awards for 2009 (Barack Obama), passing thru 2010 (Liu Xiaobo) to come to 2011 where the award is shared by three women (Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Leymah Gbowee and Tawakkul Karman) “for their non-violent struggle for the safety of women’s rights to full participation in peace-building work”.

Whereas Barack Obama’s award was premature as time has demonstrated, Liu Xiaobo’s final compensation was a longer jail term in the wake of Western silence; and the three women from Liberia (Ellen Johnson Sirleaf & Leymah Gbowee) and Yemen (Tawakkul Karman) may well have to wait ages before women’s rights, or citizen’s rights for that matter, are respected and full participation given to these in Africa and the Middle East. Much less will it be possible to see peace-building in these parts of the world after the Western blunders in international affairs affecting the countries of those regions.

The world went into an economic descending spiral that commenced with the 2007 U.S. sub-prime crisis and continued with the 2008 Lehman Brothers scandal, dragging the world into an even deeper dilemma – the total absence of ethics in the search for a common solution to our woes.

The Arab Spring that commenced with a bonzo burning of the young Tunisian, Mohamed Bouazizi, in Sidi Bouzid on December 17, 2010, set off a series of protests all over Africa and the Middle East, causing the fall of a number of long-term dictators ruling the region with complacent U.S. and European support. Curiously enough, all the U.S.-E.U. friendly dictators (Ben Ali of Tunisia, Mubarak of Egypt) have saved their necks thus far whilst others (Saleh of Yemen, Algeria’s Bouteflika or Syria’s Assad) continue ruling their territories with uneven Western support. Only one leader, Muammar el-Qaddafi, was assassinated in the hands of the rising political leaders of the ‘liberated Libya’ with NATO bombing support and United Nations sanction, in the name of civilian protection.

Do leaders really think the world is so blind not to see that all of their actions are a mere farce to cover up the fact that this world is governed by vested interests pulling the strings from back-stage?

As in Iraq and Afghanistan, petroleum and other fuels have been in the bulls-eye of all conflicts. The Northern African and Middle East conflagrations are along the same line, with Qaddafi’s elimination vital to cut off any possible leadership against vested interest moves to control the regional energetic resources. Furthermore, tiny conflicts are profitable for large corporations engaged in armament & aircraft technologies; and likewise these are of interest to companies offering their security services in unstable situations all over the world.

The sixth G-20 Summit is scheduled in Cannes November 3 & 4, with French President Nicholas Sarkozy as host. Long past is the first 2008 summit in Washington D.C. where he clamoured for “the re-foundation of capitalism”. Also forgotten, it seems, are U.S. President Obama’s September 8, 2009 statement on the Pittsburgh summit, “… It’s important to note how far we have come in preventing a global economic catastrophe. A year ago, our economy was in a freefall. …. The steps that we have taken to jumpstart growth have also been coordinated with our partners around the world. …. As the leaders of the world’s largest economies, we have a responsibility to work together on behalf of sustained growth, while putting in place the rules of the road that can prevent this kind of crisis from happening again.”

At Cannes, not only has capitalism not been re-founded nor have the world leaders worked together on behalf of sustained growth but also, and most important of all, we have followed a path in the wrong direction that leads to, not prevents, a global socio-economic catastrophe.

Well and good to claim women’s rights for all those who may not still have them all over the world but better still would be to stop once and for all 25,000 daily deaths due to hunger and disease.

How can this be possible in a planet capable of feeding twice its population?

The only answer that comes up to my mind is that we, the anguished citizens of the world, are playing a lopsided betting game in capitalism’s casino, where our meagre resources are up against 1 to a million odds in a vested interests rigged roulette.

Fernando Fuster-Fabra

Barcelona, Spain     


20 YEARS AFTER, FROM THE USSR TO PRESENT-DAY RUSSIA

August 18, 2011
Leave a Comment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spanish version :-    http://wp.me/pRlnf-4m

 

After a failed coup, USSR Premier Mijail Gorvachov handed over the power of the disintegrating empire to Boris Yeltsin. In no time, the USSR was no more.

Even today, we must ask ourselves what would have been of this world if the process would have remained in the hands of Gorvachov instead of Yeltsin.

In spite of the supposed end of the Cold War, at that stage, the Russia Yeltsin is supposed to have constructed is no different from the USSR that Gorvachov tried to change with his Perestroika. A convinced Leninist, this world leader was less understood at home than abroad. Nevertheless, the Western World failed to give him the support he needed. Yeltsin took over but really no change occurred than a change of name and the celebration of apparently tutored democratic elections.

Today, 20 years after, Russia has not advanced sufficiently towards democracy nor has eradicated the corrupt ways of the defunct USSR. Power is still concentrated in the hands of a few with a strongman at the helm of its destiny. As one of the emerging states that form the so-called BRIC bloc, Russia is expected to propel world economy. How is that to take place when its leaders remain adamant to democratic change in the course of its economic advances?

 

Fernando Fuster-Fabra

Barcelona, Spain

 


MALADIES OF THE UNETHICAL IN POWER

May 16, 2011
2 Comments

Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.”

–       Leo Tolstoy

Spanish version :      http://wp.me/pRlnf-47


I have often asked myself if the exercise of power of any nature produces maladies unknown to common mortals. The latest front-page news on Strauss-Kahn’s arrest in New York has revived my quest for an answer to my doubt.

As the all-powerful Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, Dominique Strauss-Kahn had raised himself to the Olympus in preparation for even greater glories to come in the forthcoming French presidential elections. No one seemed to spare oneself praise of the politician’s supposed achievements in re-conducting the entity’s policies towards a more effective IMF.

Forgotten in the midst of all such praise was a rather annoying unethical incident that by itself should have forced Dominique Strauss-Kahn to resign immediately. I am referring to his admittance of a love affair with a subordinate in the IMF in 2008, whereby he exercised abuse of authority to cover up his relationship and could have possibly benefited from his superiority in all the regretful issue. The IMF, after a rather ridiculous wash-up investigation, accepted the Managing Director’s apologies and buried the issue without more ado.

Last Saturday, Strauss-Kahn was arrested when he had hastily boarded a flight to Paris. Nothing would seem unusual for him to depart the USA towards Europe, much less when he had scheduled meetings with Angela Merkel in Germany and the Eurogroup in Brussels this week. What was surprising was that in his haste to catch the flight, he had left some of his personal effects in the hotel suite that included his cell phone. Since then, he has been charged with “a criminal sexual act, attempted rape, and an unlawful imprisonment in connection with a sexual assault” on a chambermaid in a Manhattan hotel. What cannot be denied is that the NY police would hardly act with such haste, much less board a plane about to depart unless they had some solvent proof of the chambermaid’s accusation.

Allowing the margin that everyone has a right to be considered innocent until proven guilty, what cannot be forgotten is that the 2008 incident in the IMF organisation should have been sufficient for Strauss-Kahn to have been kicked out for unethical conduct in his Managing Director’s post. Not having been relieved then may now have lead to his further abuse of power in this lamentable sexual accusation filed by a chambermaid of a luxurious Manhattan hotel.

One must not forget that in 2007, the then President of the World Bank, Paul Wolfowitz, abused his power by promoting his girlfriend and hiking her pay, causing his later resignation.

Recalling said incidents such as these at the World Bank and IMF, one must come to the conclusion that either the appointees to such relevant posts are not thoroughly screened as per minimum ethical standards or these men are engrossed in a raging spiral of power that change them.

Whichever the reason, these men do not deserve to occupy relevant posts unless they can exercise power with ethics.

Fernando Fuster-Fabra

Barcelona  


Next Page »